Rudy Giuliani is the Latest in a Long Line of Clients and Partners Who Have Parted Ways with the Lawyer for Kyle Rittenhouse

Image for post
Image for post
Pierce Bainbridge founder John M. Pierce and apparently now former client Rudy Giuliani.
  • Kyle Rittenhouse’s lawyer John M. Pierce is apparently no longer representing his “good friend” Rudy Giuliani.
  • Pierce and his firm have seen several client relationships fall apart.
  • Over 30 partners have left Pierce since October 2019.

John M. Pierce is the lawyer for Kyle Rittenhouse. Pierce and his firm Pierce Bainbridge Beck Price & Hecht LLP were hired by Rudy Giuliani for the Ukraine matter in November 2019. A lawyer co-counseling with Pierce for Rittenhouse and Carter Page, has publicly announced that Pierce “previously represented Giuliani.” Rudy is apparently yet another client that has seen a relationship with Pierce Bainbridge end; several during ongoing litigation. In addition, Pierce has seen partner after partner leave since he founded his firm in 2017. This track record of turnover may be viewed as another Rittenhouse representation red flag.

While Pierce proclaimed, in February 2020, he would personally be involved in handling Giuliani’s matters it’s unclear what, if any, legal work Pierce actually did for Rudy.

With respect to Rittenhouse, Pierce has been soliciting donations for the an outfit raising funds to fight the “radical left” media, as well as for the Rittenhouse defense. As financial problems for Pierce and his firm received increased exposure, Pierce resigned from the Daily Beast, USA Today, NBC

John Pierce is no longer pictured on the Team page, which, along with the rest of the site, has changed markedly since the initial launch three weeks ago.

While Pierce says he voluntarily resigned, this is not the first Pierce relationship to hit a roadblock.

Client Relationships Fall Apart

Below are examples of clients who were either left in the lurch by Pierce’s firm or decided to terminate the relationship.

John Pierce and his then partner Jonathan Sorkowitz (The Law Offices of Jonathan A. Sorkowitz) handled the Greenway representation; the firm quit on the client.

Image for post
Image for post
Photo from The Great Neck Record: Jonathan A. Sorkowitz, ex-Pierce Bainbridge partner and Founder of The Law Offices of Jonathan A. Sorkowitz

Days before abandoning Greenway, Pierce sent an e-mail to the Greenway President; the firm’s then General Counsel Carolynn K. Beck (Goldstein & McClintock LLLP) was copied, as well as the entire firm partnership. The tone of the e-mail — filed as an exhibit to a Greenway motion — seems similar to the belligerent one Pierce has taken on Twitter in responding to Rittenhouse commenters who do disagree with, or question, him. The Pierce e-mail to his then client and Twitter examples are below.

Image for post
Image for post
John Pierce e-mail to ex-client, the President of Greenway Nutrients
Image for post
Image for post
Image for post
Image for post
Image for post
Image for post

(Pierce’s temperament was addressed in a prior Medium article, which covers, among other items, two domestic violence restraining order requests against Pierce by his former wife. Here are just a few of Pierce’s own texts tweeted by a reporter for which led to the 2019 restraining order request.)

A filing by then firm partner Patrick Bradford (Bradford Edwards & Varlack) states that this break up was based, in part, on conflicts with the client. A screenshot from Bradford’s filing is below.

Image for post
Image for post
Image for post
Image for post
Photo from Oregon Shakespeare Festival: Patrick Bradford, ex-Pierce Bainbridge partner and Founder of Bradford Edwards & Varlack LLP

While Pierce has claims he never quits, as with Greenway, Pierce’s firm quit on Andris Pukke. The client was left to continue (representing himself) and a little over a year later, Pukke suffered a $120 million judgment against him.

Image for post
Image for post

This client sought to terminate Pierce Bainbridge, as set forth in a declaration filed by John Pierce. The relationship ended, the litigation continued and new counsel was retained in February 2020. A screenshot from a Pierce filing is below.

Image for post
Image for post
This John Pierce filing in a Los Angeles court states the client wished to terminate the relationship.

This is another relationship that ended while litigation was ongoing. A filing by the ex-client below indicates that the ex-client replaced Pierce and Pierce Bainbridge with new lawyers.

Image for post
Image for post
Pierce Bainbridge and John Pierce are replaced by a client with another counsel in a Los Angeles state court action.

This client “elected to terminate” John Pierce as his lawyer in an appeal against Microsoft. Interestingly, Pierce put Hamilton up in a $1.3 million home for 2 years.

Image for post
Image for post
A Redfin home of photo of the house that a Pierce Bainbridge client lived in for 2 years with Pierce picking up the tab. The client has recently elected to terminate Pierce from representation on an appeal.

On July 1, 2020, the homeowners filed a complaint against Pierce and Hamilton personally for failure to pay rent and other claims.

The “elected to terminate” language is in a letter from Pierce to the court dated August 20, 2020. Six days later, August 26, 2020, a default judgment was entered against Pierce and Hamilton for failing to respond to the complaint by the deadline. The next day, August 27, 2020, Pierce appears to have sought out the Rittenhouse representation and began soliciting donations for .

Image for post
Image for post
Image for post
Image for post

Pierce has moved to set aside the default; his excuse for missing the deadline to respond is ‘interesting’. The termination letter, as well as an excerpt from Pierce’s motion to set aside are below.

Image for post
Image for post
Letter from Pierce to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals indicating that his client elected to terminate Pierce.
Image for post
Image for post
This is an excerpt from a Pierce filing to a Los Angeles court attempting to set aside a default judgment against Pierce and his client Skip Hamilton for missing the deadline to answer a complaint against both of them.

The Partner Exodus

Consistent with these broken client relationships, the lawyer for Kyle Rittenhouse has seen scores of partners abandon him. In 2017, Pierce founded Pierce Sergenian, by December 2018, no other partner remained. Pierce Burns was formed in December 2018, by March 2018, no other partner remained. In March 2018, Pierce Bainbridge Beck Price & Hecht was formed, since October 2019, over thirty partners have moved on, including the other four name-partners James D. Bainbridge (Bainbridge Law APC), Carolynn K. Beck (Goldstein & McClintock LLLP), Max Price (Hecht Partners) and David L. Hecht (Hecht Partners).

What Does This Mean for Kyle Rittenhouse?

John Pierce is immersed in heavy turnover; it includes client relationships.

One would hope that Kyle Rittenhouse does not end up with a fractured attorney-client relationship; that Pierce will see the Rittenhouse case through and not quit on his client, or put his client in a position where Rittenhouse may need to terminate Pierce.

One would also hope that the 17-year-old Rittenhouse is not subjected to the type of communications Pierce appears prone to resort to when faced with disagreement.

Time will tell.

Written by

Whistleblower retaliated against by the Rudy Giuliani hired corrupt Pierce Bainbridge law firm. Harvard Law graduate. Sunlight needed. @DonLew87 on Twitter.

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store